Difference between revisions of "FairvoteWRC meeting 2017-09-27"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BobJonkman (talk | contribs) (Well liked) |
BobJonkman (talk | contribs) (Fixed spacing for Resources (fixes multiple <dl>)) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
; Host Guide | ; Host Guide | ||
: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B5wRCtOTJB3wwE3DOcA65-S4vC-btBycaRuImivg3lU/edit?usp=sharing | : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B5wRCtOTJB3wwE3DOcA65-S4vC-btBycaRuImivg3lU/edit?usp=sharing | ||
− | |||
; Fair Vote Canada Strategic Plan | ; Fair Vote Canada Strategic Plan | ||
: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lIyZ1XIGqv-ykXqCJWW-eBMyyDWuCScbzbj6AE1wmJs/edit?usp=sharing | : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lIyZ1XIGqv-ykXqCJWW-eBMyyDWuCScbzbj6AE1wmJs/edit?usp=sharing | ||
− | |||
; Survey Results | ; Survey Results | ||
: https://secure.fairvote.ca/sites/secure.fairvote.ca/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/2017_funding%20next%20leg_2019plan_donatepage.png?noload | : https://secure.fairvote.ca/sites/secure.fairvote.ca/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/2017_funding%20next%20leg_2019plan_donatepage.png?noload | ||
− | |||
; Meeting Announcement | ; Meeting Announcement | ||
: http://listserv.thinkers.org/pipermail/fvc-wat-announce_listserv.thinkers.org/2017-September/000996.html | : http://listserv.thinkers.org/pipermail/fvc-wat-announce_listserv.thinkers.org/2017-September/000996.html | ||
− | |||
; Meeting Notes | ; Meeting Notes | ||
: https://sobac.com/wiki/FairvoteWRC_meeting_2017-09-27 | : https://sobac.com/wiki/FairvoteWRC_meeting_2017-09-27 | ||
=== Meeting Notes === | === Meeting Notes === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Meeting notes taken by Bob Jonkman. | ||
==== Introductions ==== | ==== Introductions ==== | ||
Line 50: | Line 48: | ||
** Who were elected with the current system, and so are unlikely to want it changed. | ** Who were elected with the current system, and so are unlikely to want it changed. | ||
* Had given up on voting, but didn't understand the problem that made the popular vote not equal to the number of seats. | * Had given up on voting, but didn't understand the problem that made the popular vote not equal to the number of seats. | ||
− | * Can't call ourselves a democracy. | + | * Can't call ourselves a democracy. |
− | * Promise broken | + | * Promise broken. |
* Every election things get worse. | * Every election things get worse. | ||
* Working in politics, now understand the wasted vote and wasted effort. | * Working in politics, now understand the wasted vote and wasted effort. | ||
Line 59: | Line 57: | ||
* Unfair system (First Past The Post) | * Unfair system (First Past The Post) | ||
** Canada is only one of three FPTP countries. | ** Canada is only one of three FPTP countries. | ||
− | * Want local representation | + | * Want local representation. |
* It's a money game. | * It's a money game. | ||
** More $$ means more chance to win the election. | ** More $$ means more chance to win the election. | ||
==== Where are people from? ==== | ==== Where are people from? ==== | ||
− | {| | + | {| class="wikitable" summary="Attendance" |
| Cambridge || 0 | | Cambridge || 0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 92: | Line 90: | ||
* Wants to be an MP, stay an MP. | * Wants to be an MP, stay an MP. | ||
** Will switch his opinion on anything as necessary to stay elected. | ** Will switch his opinion on anything as necessary to stay elected. | ||
− | * [http:// | + | * [http://www.fairvotewrc.ca/there-is-a-responsible-path-forward-electoral-reform/ Marwan's letter] was not personally written. |
** He has very good staff to do that for him, fooled some people into thinking it was genuine. | ** He has very good staff to do that for him, fooled some people into thinking it was genuine. | ||
Line 114: | Line 112: | ||
* MPs need to own what they say | * MPs need to own what they say | ||
* Use #hashtags on social media to coordinate flash mobs to engage in civil disobedience. | * Use #hashtags on social media to coordinate flash mobs to engage in civil disobedience. | ||
− | |||
==== Is this a "Safe Riding"? ==== | ==== Is this a "Safe Riding"? ==== | ||
Line 200: | Line 197: | ||
+ | ==== Advice for the campaigns of other candidates ==== | ||
+ | * Need more money. | ||
+ | * Be stronger in your message. | ||
+ | ** Don't be a centrist! | ||
+ | * Need more volunteers | ||
+ | * Start knocking on doors. | ||
+ | ** Liberal MPs and candidates are already knocking on doors. | ||
+ | * Operate on principle! | ||
+ | ** (candidates should stick to their principles, not sway to popular opinion) | ||
+ | * Can the NDP and Green Party cooperate? | ||
+ | ** "Cooperate For Canada" was a movement to get two pro-PR parties to run only one candidate to avoid splitting the vote. | ||
+ | ** But neither NDP nor Green Party were too keen on resigning their candidate. | ||
+ | * Hire Rick Mercer to promote cooperation. | ||
+ | ** Crowdfund $5 to hear him speak. | ||
+ | * Raise more money! (for opposition candidates) | ||
+ | * Want a candidate who wins without money, who wins on merit. | ||
+ | * Martin Luther King quote "Peace is not just a goal, but the means to a goal". | ||
+ | ** Apply the same to cooperation. | ||
+ | * Advice to Fair Voters: Learn from Bernie Sanders. | ||
+ | * Opposition candidates should start their campaign sooner. | ||
+ | * Use pyramid techniques: A friend calls two friends, and so on. | ||
+ | ** This is [[Wikipedia:Marshall Ganz]] -- the Snowflake model. | ||
+ | * The Waterloo NDP campaign: The "star" candidate wasn't stellar. | ||
+ | * Parties need to prop up their candidates. Needs $$$ | ||
+ | * Debates are engineered (don't provide real info, but soundbites; favour incumbents) | ||
+ | * Bardish Chagger was groomed for the position | ||
+ | ** Knew how to schmooze | ||
+ | * Candidates need to learn to schmooze | ||
+ | * Green Party candidates need a higher profile since they don't run attack ads | ||
+ | ** "Feisty isn't the same as attacking." | ||
+ | * Have a strong candidate who is good at public speaking. | ||
+ | ** But that didn't matter for Liberal candidates. | ||
+ | * Prediction: Incumbents (Liberals) will have two key issues | ||
+ | ** Maybe opposition candidates need to rally around these issues. | ||
+ | ** NAFTA? Not sexy, maybe something else will come up before 2019. | ||
+ | * Candidate's success is dependent on the charisma of the leader. | ||
+ | * The "soft coalition" of Indigenous votes, youth, and Green + NDP who voted strategically for Liberals | ||
+ | ** worked for Liberals, but no more. | ||
+ | * Show the voters they didn't get what they want. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Advice for Fair Vote ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Fair Vote should focus on Waterloo | ||
+ | ** Split between NDP and PR supporters | ||
+ | ** Best chance to get a Pro-PR candidate | ||
+ | OR | ||
+ | * Fair Vote should focus on Kitchener South--Hespeler | ||
+ | ** Marwan Tabbara is a weak candidate | ||
+ | ** Lorne Bruce (NDP) is a strong candidate | ||
+ | OR | ||
+ | * General discussion on Proporational Representation is too general. | ||
+ | ** Need a specific strategy (voting system), eg. MMPPR (Mixed Member Preferential Proportional Representation), or STV (Single Transferable Vote). | ||
+ | ** Fair Vote Canada gets behind (endorses) '''one''' (or two) voting system(s). | ||
+ | * PR makes intuitive sense, but specific systems can't be proven to work in Canada. | ||
+ | ** People poke holes in any proposed system. | ||
+ | * Use a local model. | ||
+ | ** Use Waterloo Region examples to illustrate PR to Waterloo Region voters. | ||
+ | ** For people who want details, give them international examples. | ||
+ | * Fair Vote Canada should focus on the Ontario 2018 Provincial Election as well. | ||
+ | ** PR is more likely to be achieved provincially (following BC's success). | ||
+ | ** Ontario Provincial election is an excuse to talk about PR. | ||
+ | * Have people moved past favouring a specific system? | ||
+ | ** Everyone has a pet system. | ||
+ | ** FVC needs to say "We'll support a system with these criteria: 1) 2) 3)" | ||
+ | *** eg. low [[Wikipedia:Gallagher Index]]; regional representation | ||
+ | ** But FVC should stop short of endorsing a specific system | ||
+ | * FVC should use the phrase "Election Reform", not "Electoral Reform" | ||
+ | ** Use the words that people already know. | ||
[[Category:FairvoteWRC]] | [[Category:FairvoteWRC]] |
Latest revision as of 14:21, 7 October 2017
Guided Discussion for Fair Vote Canada Strategy 2019
These are the resources and meeting notes for the Discussion Night meeting we held on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 at 7:00pm in the Bread & Roses Community Meeting Room.
Resources
- Host Guide
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B5wRCtOTJB3wwE3DOcA65-S4vC-btBycaRuImivg3lU/edit?usp=sharing
- Fair Vote Canada Strategic Plan
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lIyZ1XIGqv-ykXqCJWW-eBMyyDWuCScbzbj6AE1wmJs/edit?usp=sharing
- Survey Results
- https://secure.fairvote.ca/sites/secure.fairvote.ca/files/civicrm/persist/contribute/images/2017_funding%20next%20leg_2019plan_donatepage.png?noload
- Meeting Announcement
- http://listserv.thinkers.org/pipermail/fvc-wat-announce_listserv.thinkers.org/2017-September/000996.html
- Meeting Notes
- https://sobac.com/wiki/FairvoteWRC_meeting_2017-09-27
Meeting Notes
Meeting notes taken by Bob Jonkman.
Introductions
“Why is this issue personally important to you? What makes you care about this issue enough to join us tonight? ”
- 5 MPs have only 29% support in their riding.
- Furious about numbers. How can we fix it?
- Last few elections elected a majority with only 39%.
- Promises are not kept.
- (participant has been copying letters to Bardish Chagger)
- Promise broken.
- Need a collaborative or coalition government .
- Better social programs, &c.
- Have been voting Green, but my vote hasn't been effective.
- Broken promise.
- But there's still time to pass legislation to implement Electoral Reform!
- Needed to vote strategically because of the promise of Proportional Representation.
- Need a better system for working together.
- Started with the 2007 Ontario Referendum.
- Parties are elected with minuscule numbers.
- (participant worked with "Vote Together", "Lead Now", &c)
- Annoyed when promises are broken.
- Promises...
- Just getting involved in politics, checking out Fair Vote.
- Wish we had a real representative democracy; instead we have gross distortions
- False majorities, wrong-way winners.
- Hate voting strategically.
- Still hopeful!
- Impatient -- have been voting for decades, still haven't elected anyone.
- Change the rules for voting, but we need approval from the politicians to change.
- Who were elected with the current system, and so are unlikely to want it changed.
- Had given up on voting, but didn't understand the problem that made the popular vote not equal to the number of seats.
- Can't call ourselves a democracy.
- Promise broken.
- Every election things get worse.
- Working in politics, now understand the wasted vote and wasted effort.
- Politicians promised PR, didn't deliver.
- Heard Brian Tanguay speak.
- Fed up with Liberal promise: Campaign from the left, govern from the right.
- Unfair system (First Past The Post)
- Canada is only one of three FPTP countries.
- Want local representation.
- It's a money game.
- More $$ means more chance to win the election.
Where are people from?
Cambridge | 0 |
Kitchener--Conestoga | 2 |
Kitchener Centre | 5 |
Kitchener South--Hespeler | 2 |
Waterloo | 4 |
Pro-PR MPs-- at risk?
- Hah! No MP (in Waterloo Region) really supports Proportional Representation!
- Bardish Chagger (Liberal, Waterloo)
- Never said anything in favour.
- Made election promise "Last FPTP election"
- Toes the party line.
- Marwan Tabbara (Liberal, Kitchener South--Hespeler)
- Is an animal of the Party.
- May not have a real opinion.
- Will back the Party on anything.
- Wants to be an MP, stay an MP.
- Will switch his opinion on anything as necessary to stay elected.
- Marwan's letter was not personally written.
- He has very good staff to do that for him, fooled some people into thinking it was genuine.
- Raj Saini (Liberal, Kitchener Centre)
- Toes Party line.
- Made weak arguments about the Party line (and why he broke his promise)
- Got into politics because he wanted a National Pharmacare plan
- But he didn't bother to show up for the Council of Canadians' presentation on Pharmacare.
- When we delivered petitions he seemed afraid of us.
- He owes his job to the Party.
- During the campaign he was very well informed on PR, and was in favour.
Miscellaneous Comments
- We still have years until 2019, we can make existing MPs suffer.
- But the parliamentary process requires 24 months lead time to enact Electoral Reform.
- MPs aren't engaged with us.
- We need to protest, throw red paint filled balloons at their constituency offices.
- Civil disobedience!
- MPs need to own what they say
- Use #hashtags on social media to coordinate flash mobs to engage in civil disobedience.
Is this a "Safe Riding"?
- Kitchener Centre (Raj Saini, Liberal)
- Kitchener Centre is not a safe riding for Raj Saini.
- But the chance of electing an NDP or Green MP? Can't happen.
- Is speaking with MPs effective?
- Hasn't been...
- Then why continue to do that?
- Hasn't been...
- Youth wants to do something.
- Use crowdfunding to activate the youth.
- General population doesn't understand our current system, the problems with it, or the solution.
- Even highly educated people!
- Focus less on MPs, Fair Vote should concentrate on educating people
- This gives us the leverage to influence MPs
- That leverage is the threat of not being re-elected.
- But Main Stream Media is complicit (in suppressing info on ER)
- Try to attract media, but keep it completely non-violent.
- We Are The Media
- Everyone has cell phone cameras and uses social media.
- Hold public events to attract the Main Stream Media, and shame the MPs.
- Waterloo (Bardish Chagger, Liberal)
- Safe seat? Waterloo is a swing riding.
- Has NDP MPP, previous PC and Liberal MPs.
- Even an NDP MP! (Wikipedia:Max Saltsman from 1964 to 1979)
- Has NDP MPP, previous PC and Liberal MPs.
- How would "Vote Together" work?
- People won't do it again.
- Fair Vote should just get people to vote!
- but wasted votes...
- With education people are more inclined to vote.
- Get together with other groups.
- eg. Anti-poverty groups (Basic Income Waterloo, ALIVe, Social Development Centre)
- Faith Groups
- Fair Vote Waterloo has an Outreach Strategy
- Last year Outreach Committee targeted Antipoverty groups, gave presentations
- This year they're targeting Faith groups and Social Action groups
- Kitchener South--Hespeler (Marwan Tabbara, Liberal)
- Redistributed results (from riding boundary change) indicates the area would have voted for the Conservatives
- Neighbourhood Association held an All Party Candidates Meeting.
- Marwan Tabbara was the weakest candidate.
- But he won because of Strategic Voting to unseat the Conservatives.
- People vote for the Prime Minister, not the local candidate.
- Six weeks before the 2019 Election Campaign start awareness of "Last election under FPTP"
- Cambridge (Bryan May, Liberal)
- is not recognized as a candidate, eg. at grocery store
- Cambridge is a potential swing riding
- Kitchener--Conestoga (Harold Albrecht, Conservative)
- Had a small plurality in 2015 election.
- But had true majority in previous elections.
- Liberal candidate Tim Louis won't promote PR if elected.
How well-liked is your MP?
- Afraid that Raj Saini is well-liked.
- No-one knows who Marwan Tabbara is.
- Bardish Chagger is very popular.
- Bryan May is neutral.
- Harold Albrecht is popular.
- NAFTA issue takes precedence
- Other issues are more important to voters
- But those other issues depend on PR to get done
- Other issues are more important to voters
- Fair Vote should raise money and raise profile of the Proporational Representation issue.
- Get people together
- Barbeques, social media
- Work with University groups
- Spend money on radio ads
Advice for the campaigns of other candidates
- Need more money.
- Be stronger in your message.
- Don't be a centrist!
- Need more volunteers
- Start knocking on doors.
- Liberal MPs and candidates are already knocking on doors.
- Operate on principle!
- (candidates should stick to their principles, not sway to popular opinion)
- Can the NDP and Green Party cooperate?
- "Cooperate For Canada" was a movement to get two pro-PR parties to run only one candidate to avoid splitting the vote.
- But neither NDP nor Green Party were too keen on resigning their candidate.
- Hire Rick Mercer to promote cooperation.
- Crowdfund $5 to hear him speak.
- Raise more money! (for opposition candidates)
- Want a candidate who wins without money, who wins on merit.
- Martin Luther King quote "Peace is not just a goal, but the means to a goal".
- Apply the same to cooperation.
- Advice to Fair Voters: Learn from Bernie Sanders.
- Opposition candidates should start their campaign sooner.
- Use pyramid techniques: A friend calls two friends, and so on.
- This is Wikipedia:Marshall Ganz -- the Snowflake model.
- The Waterloo NDP campaign: The "star" candidate wasn't stellar.
- Parties need to prop up their candidates. Needs $$$
- Debates are engineered (don't provide real info, but soundbites; favour incumbents)
- Bardish Chagger was groomed for the position
- Knew how to schmooze
- Candidates need to learn to schmooze
- Green Party candidates need a higher profile since they don't run attack ads
- "Feisty isn't the same as attacking."
- Have a strong candidate who is good at public speaking.
- But that didn't matter for Liberal candidates.
- Prediction: Incumbents (Liberals) will have two key issues
- Maybe opposition candidates need to rally around these issues.
- NAFTA? Not sexy, maybe something else will come up before 2019.
- Candidate's success is dependent on the charisma of the leader.
- The "soft coalition" of Indigenous votes, youth, and Green + NDP who voted strategically for Liberals
- worked for Liberals, but no more.
- Show the voters they didn't get what they want.
Advice for Fair Vote
- Fair Vote should focus on Waterloo
- Split between NDP and PR supporters
- Best chance to get a Pro-PR candidate
OR
- Fair Vote should focus on Kitchener South--Hespeler
- Marwan Tabbara is a weak candidate
- Lorne Bruce (NDP) is a strong candidate
OR
- General discussion on Proporational Representation is too general.
- Need a specific strategy (voting system), eg. MMPPR (Mixed Member Preferential Proportional Representation), or STV (Single Transferable Vote).
- Fair Vote Canada gets behind (endorses) one (or two) voting system(s).
- PR makes intuitive sense, but specific systems can't be proven to work in Canada.
- People poke holes in any proposed system.
- Use a local model.
- Use Waterloo Region examples to illustrate PR to Waterloo Region voters.
- For people who want details, give them international examples.
- Fair Vote Canada should focus on the Ontario 2018 Provincial Election as well.
- PR is more likely to be achieved provincially (following BC's success).
- Ontario Provincial election is an excuse to talk about PR.
- Have people moved past favouring a specific system?
- Everyone has a pet system.
- FVC needs to say "We'll support a system with these criteria: 1) 2) 3)"
- eg. low Wikipedia:Gallagher Index; regional representation
- But FVC should stop short of endorsing a specific system
- FVC should use the phrase "Election Reform", not "Electoral Reform"
- Use the words that people already know.