Difference between revisions of "FairvoteWRC meeting 2017-02-26"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BobJonkman (talk | contribs) (Finished introductions) |
BobJonkman (talk | contribs) (Finished to Indivisible) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** Sharon reads a quote from [https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/23/hes-a-liar-why-the-left-coast-may-be-writing-off-justin-trudeau/ David Suzuki in iPolitics.ca] | ** Sharon reads a quote from [https://ipolitics.ca/2017/02/23/hes-a-liar-why-the-left-coast-may-be-writing-off-justin-trudeau/ David Suzuki in iPolitics.ca] | ||
** Two documents: | ** Two documents: | ||
− | *** One theoretical: Indivisible | + | *** One theoretical: ''Indivisible'' |
− | *** One practical: Pathways For Change | + | *** One practical: ''Pathways For Change'' |
** Objectives | ** Objectives | ||
*** Keep Electoral Reform top-of-mind | *** Keep Electoral Reform top-of-mind | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*** Put pressure on politicians | *** Put pressure on politicians | ||
*** Recognize that Electoral Reform '''is''' an issue for many people, eg. Public Education | *** Recognize that Electoral Reform '''is''' an issue for many people, eg. Public Education | ||
− | * Discussion (Action Items) | + | * Discussion (Action Items) |
+ | ** '''1:''' ''Pathways For Change'' | ||
+ | *** Theories: | ||
+ | **** Unlocking policy making process | ||
+ | **** Why some policies go forward and some don't | ||
+ | **** What works and what doesn't | ||
+ | **** What is successful advocacy | ||
+ | *** Policy Windows | ||
+ | **** Policies need to be seen as technically feasible | ||
+ | **** Policy makers must be interested | ||
+ | *** Electoral Reform no longer meets the needs of the Liberal Party (a majority government) | ||
+ | *** How a problem is defined makes a difference in the attention it gets | ||
+ | **** Redefine the issue to suit the politicians | ||
+ | **** Redefine the issue to suit the electorate | ||
+ | **** '''Redefine the issue in the public mind''' | ||
+ | *** "Liberals don't care about you" | ||
+ | *** Issue definition is important | ||
+ | **** to Politicians? | ||
+ | **** to the Public? | ||
+ | **** to the Community? | ||
+ | *** Make friends within the media | ||
+ | **** Change the message -- we can't buy enough media coverage to counter Liberal media budget | ||
+ | *** "Find anger, work on that." | ||
+ | *** Campaigning on fear? | ||
+ | **** Liberals control the message | ||
+ | *** Contact the media '''every''' time we do something good | ||
+ | *** Build relationships with politicians | ||
+ | **** and other community groups | ||
+ | *** Keep balance: | ||
+ | **** Groups are rational | ||
+ | **** Individuals are radical | ||
+ | *** Message: Strategic voting doesn't have to be true | ||
+ | *** In all contacts '''be respectful and polite''' (important!) | ||
+ | *** Make linkages: What's in it for me? "Electoral Reform fixes everything" | ||
+ | *** Trump appeal based on fear and anger (effective!) | ||
+ | *** Need to connect on an emotional level | ||
+ | *** Every policy issue: "The solution is Proportional Representation" | ||
+ | *** Hope Spring (counselling for cancer patients) is closed! | ||
+ | **** Example of a social issue | ||
+ | **** Our letters to politicians can address that issue | ||
+ | **** This issue can be addressed by more balanced represenation | ||
+ | *** Step up our letter writing campaign to include broader issues | ||
+ | *** Reach out to other communities ([https://kwpeace.ca KWPeace]?) | ||
+ | *** Call in to call-in shows | ||
+ | **** Phone the editors, producers of shows about Electoral Reform | ||
+ | *** How to find the MPs' schedules? | ||
+ | **** Use an online tool like [https://www.changedetection.com/ Change Detection] | ||
+ | *** Buy a new event banner (ask Laurel Russwurm to design?) | ||
+ | *** List all issues affected by Proportional Representation on banner | ||
+ | **** Income inequality | ||
+ | **** Fossil fuel divestment | ||
+ | **** etc. | ||
+ | *** Print business cards with issues affected by PR | ||
+ | *** Greatest link between effective government and Proportional Representation | ||
+ | **** "'''Best decisions are made by groups that are the most diverse'''" | ||
+ | **** This can win over a conservative thinker | ||
+ | *** Cathe wrote 50 Christmas cards to Bloc, NDP, Conservatives: "Please support Electoral Reform" | ||
+ | **** Response: 1 return card from Thomas Mulcair (NDP) | ||
+ | *** Liberals selling memberships | ||
+ | **** Swamping the vote for policy issues | ||
+ | ** '''2:''' Indivisible: Core Strategies for Influencing Politicians | ||
+ | *** More than calls and petitions |
Revision as of 02:43, 16 April 2017
2017 Campaign Tactics meeting
- Held: Sunday, 26 February 2017 at St. John's Kitchen, 97 Victoria Ave. South
- Event Notice: Fair Vote Waterloo Campaign Tactics meeting
- Present: Sharon Sommerville, David Dirks, Rob Steel, Bob Jonkman, Donald Fraser, Cathe Campbell, Stuart Chandler, Cathy Scott, Ron Bowman
- Introductions
- Opening Comments
- Sharon reads a quote from David Suzuki in iPolitics.ca
- Two documents:
- One theoretical: Indivisible
- One practical: Pathways For Change
- Objectives
- Keep Electoral Reform top-of-mind
- Not persuading Justin Trudeau
- Differentiate Liberals and NDP
- (ironclad guarantee of MMPR from NDP - more of a tactic than a strategy)
- Punish every Liberal member in Parliament for breaking promise
- Keep Electoral Reform alive and provide public education
- Think of Electoral Reform as a pilot project (eg. Ted Kennedy and Medicare)
- Put pressure on politicians
- Recognize that Electoral Reform is an issue for many people, eg. Public Education
- Discussion (Action Items)
- 1: Pathways For Change
- Theories:
- Unlocking policy making process
- Why some policies go forward and some don't
- What works and what doesn't
- What is successful advocacy
- Policy Windows
- Policies need to be seen as technically feasible
- Policy makers must be interested
- Electoral Reform no longer meets the needs of the Liberal Party (a majority government)
- How a problem is defined makes a difference in the attention it gets
- Redefine the issue to suit the politicians
- Redefine the issue to suit the electorate
- Redefine the issue in the public mind
- "Liberals don't care about you"
- Issue definition is important
- to Politicians?
- to the Public?
- to the Community?
- Make friends within the media
- Change the message -- we can't buy enough media coverage to counter Liberal media budget
- "Find anger, work on that."
- Campaigning on fear?
- Liberals control the message
- Contact the media every time we do something good
- Build relationships with politicians
- and other community groups
- Keep balance:
- Groups are rational
- Individuals are radical
- Message: Strategic voting doesn't have to be true
- In all contacts be respectful and polite (important!)
- Make linkages: What's in it for me? "Electoral Reform fixes everything"
- Trump appeal based on fear and anger (effective!)
- Need to connect on an emotional level
- Every policy issue: "The solution is Proportional Representation"
- Hope Spring (counselling for cancer patients) is closed!
- Example of a social issue
- Our letters to politicians can address that issue
- This issue can be addressed by more balanced represenation
- Step up our letter writing campaign to include broader issues
- Reach out to other communities (KWPeace?)
- Call in to call-in shows
- Phone the editors, producers of shows about Electoral Reform
- How to find the MPs' schedules?
- Use an online tool like Change Detection
- Buy a new event banner (ask Laurel Russwurm to design?)
- List all issues affected by Proportional Representation on banner
- Income inequality
- Fossil fuel divestment
- etc.
- Print business cards with issues affected by PR
- Greatest link between effective government and Proportional Representation
- "Best decisions are made by groups that are the most diverse"
- This can win over a conservative thinker
- Cathe wrote 50 Christmas cards to Bloc, NDP, Conservatives: "Please support Electoral Reform"
- Response: 1 return card from Thomas Mulcair (NDP)
- Liberals selling memberships
- Swamping the vote for policy issues
- Theories:
- 2: Indivisible: Core Strategies for Influencing Politicians
- More than calls and petitions
- 1: Pathways For Change