Difference between revisions of "Estimating Time and Resources/Meeting Notes for 2017-01-16"

From SOBAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Draft page for Meeting Notes: Estimating Resources)
 
(Formatting applied)
Line 1: Line 1:
Estimating Resources
+
; Monday, 16 January 2017
====================
+
: Event Announcement: https://www.meetup.com/NetSquared-Kitchener-Waterloo/events/234260371/
 +
: Meeting Notes: https://www.meetup.com/NetSquared-Kitchener-Waterloo/messages/boards/thread/50529155
  
Announcements
+
== Estimating Time and Resources ==
-------------
+
In IT we are often asked to estimate the time and resources assorted tasks will take. Often these time/cost estimates are tied to funding, grants, and resource allocations. Unfortunately, many of us struggle at coming up with estimates more accurate than "it will take longer than expected". What are some strategies and best practices we can use to come up with better estimates? Under what circumstances does estimating things become easier? Harder? Under what conditions should we spend a lot of effort making estimates, and under what circumstances should we not?
  
- Laptop Rescue Mission this Saturday, 4-8pm
+
When have you had good experiences making estimates? When have you struggled?  
- Does somebody want to take over the group?
 
  
 +
=== Announcements ===
  
Estimating Resources
+
* Laptop Rescue Mission this Saturday, 21 February 2017, 4-8pm
--------------------
+
* Does somebody want to take over the group?
  
- What are strategies and best practices to get better estimates?
+
=== Taking Over the Group ===
- Under what circumstances does estimation become easier?
 
- Under what circumstances does estimation become harder?
 
- When should we spend a lot of effort making estimates?
 
  
 +
* Is there a venue available?
 +
* QSC is noisy
 +
* Other TWC spaces need staffing
 +
* Meeting at Steve's house?
 +
* Will anybody take the mailing lists?
 +
* New organizers: Bob Jonkman, Marc Paré.
 +
* Should we be on meetup?
 +
** mailman does some of this
 +
** NetSquared does not help with promotion
 +
** meetup has a large user base
 +
** there is a blog and a wiki already
 +
** there is a twitter account
 +
* They want the group to be face to face
 +
* Bob likes the peer to peer conversation
  
Taking Over the Group
+
* March meeting's at Steve's house
---------------------
+
* Marc will look for other venues
 +
* Communitech has space available to tech groups: Marc
  
- Is there a venue available?
+
* Moving the mailing lists: Steve
- QSC is noisy
+
* Marc can host on his server and get a domain name
- Other TWC spaces need staffing
 
- Meeting at Steve's house?
 
- Will anybody take the mailing lists?
 
- New organizers: Bob Jonkman, Marc Paré.
 
- Should we be on meetup?
 
+ mailman does some of this
 
+ NetSquared does not help with promotion
 
+ meetup has a large user base
 
+ there is a blog and a wiki already
 
+ there is a twitter account
 
- They want the group to be face to face
 
- Bob likes the peer to peer conversation
 
  
- March meeting's at Steve's house
+
* Future topic: Project management software
- Marc will look for other venues
 
- Communitech has space available to tech groups: Marc
 
  
- Moving the mailing lists: Steve
 
- Marc can host on his server and get a domain name
 
  
- Future topic: Project management software
+
=== Estimating Resources ===
 +
==== Discussion Points ====
  
Estimating Resources
+
* What are strategies and best practices to get better estimates?
--------------------
+
* Under what circumstances does estimation become easier?
 +
* Under what circumstances does estimation become harder?
 +
* When should we spend a lot of effort making estimates?
  
- Horror story: server installation
+
==== Discussion ====
+ building a server room that needed dedicated cooling
 
+ he estimated power consumption of each device
 
+ UPSes only need to be sized for the running current (they are built to
 
handle startup current already)
 
+ He ended up overestimating by three times
 
+ The air conditioner would freeze the pipes and everything would shut
 
down
 
+ He looked up currents instead of measuring them
 
+ How do you deal with the exhaust heat?
 
+ The UPSes had meters for measuring electricity draw
 
+ But then they dismantled the server room for other reasons
 
  
- When is it easy?
+
* Horror story: server installation
+ Figuring out spending is easy?
+
** building a server room that needed dedicated cooling
* In the horror story they sized based on existing equipment
+
** he estimated power consumption of each device
* Looking up specs can be difficult
+
** UPSes only need to be sized for the running current (they are built to handle startup current already)
+ Never?
+
** He ended up overestimating by three times
+ When you have done this project before?
+
** The air conditioner would freeze the pipes and everything would shut down
* There are differences between software and hardware
+
** He looked up currents instead of measuring them
* But sometimes you make software similar to the stuff you made before
+
** How do you deal with the exhaust heat?
+ When you can look at projects similar organizations have done?
+
** The UPSes had meters for measuring electricity draw
* How do you get that information?
+
** But then they dismantled the server room for other reasons
  
- Mythical man month comes into play
+
* When is it easy?
+ You cannot predict how managers will manage the project
+
** Figuring out spending is easy?
 +
*** In the horror story they sized based on existing equipment
 +
*** Looking up specs can be difficult
 +
** Never?
 +
** When you have done this project before?
 +
*** There are differences between software and hardware
 +
*** But sometimes you make software similar to the stuff you made before
 +
** When you can look at projects similar organizations have done?
 +
*** How do you get that information?
  
- Example: replacing a network was the single largest line item
+
* Mythical man month comes into play
 +
** You cannot predict how managers will manage the project
  
- It is harder than you think always
+
* Example: replacing a network was the single largest line item
  
- There is always effort associated with making estimates
+
* It is harder than you think always
+ When is it worth the effort?
 
+ When projects are expensive
 
+ When projects are tied to specific grants
 
  
- Waterfall vs agile software methodologies
+
* There is always effort associated with making estimates
+ Don't estimate everything at the beginning
+
** When is it worth the effort?
+ Can you make estimates a little at a time?
+
** When projects are expensive
+ But budgets are always waterfall, not agile
+
** When projects are tied to specific grants
  
- But we tend to overengineer things
+
* Waterfall vs agile software methodologies
+ But then your results are rejected
+
** Don't estimate everything at the beginning
 +
** Can you make estimates a little at a time?
 +
** But budgets are always waterfall, not agile
  
- Projects always have unanticipated things
+
* But we tend to overengineer things
 +
** But then your results are rejected
  
- It is expedient to underestimate costs to win contracts and political support
+
* Projects always have unanticipated things
+ What will future maintenence costs be?
 
+ If you lowball costs then you get approved
 
+ Who pays for the overage
 
+ But operational budgets are overestimated so that you get a surplus later
 
+ End of year rollovers are political
 
+ Surpluses are seen as weaknesses, not frugality
 
+ This applies to nonprofits as well
 
+ Bureaucrats look good when they give large amounts of money
 
+ There are not good incentives to share funds across departments/projects
 
  
- Does that mean IT is always having to convince management for funds?
+
* It is expedient to underestimate costs to win contracts and political support
+ IT is always a cost sink
+
** What will future maintenence costs be?
+ But technologies can reduce labour costs and stop people waste time
+
** If you lowball costs then you get approved
+ Workers should enjoy the additional gains from productivity gains
+
** Who pays for the overage
 +
** But operational budgets are overestimated so that you get a surplus later
 +
** End of year rollovers are political
 +
** Surpluses are seen as weaknesses, not frugality
 +
** This applies to nonprofits as well
 +
** Bureaucrats look good when they give large amounts of money
 +
** There are not good incentives to share funds across departments/projects
  
- How do you position yourself so that you get buy-in?
+
* Does that mean IT is always having to convince management for funds?
+ Get the people who are affected to talk to management too
+
** IT is always a cost sink
 +
** But technologies can reduce labour costs and stop people waste time
 +
** Workers should enjoy the additional gains from productivity gains
  
- Sometimes estimates are done to argue for funds and sometimes they are used to find projects that should not go ahead
+
* How do you position yourself so that you get buy-in?
 +
** Get the people who are affected to talk to management too
  
- If you know that you are going to need something then just go and do it
+
* Sometimes estimates are done to argue for funds and sometimes they are used to find projects that should not go ahead
+ But senior management does not trust the estimates, so they hire
 
consultants, which causes conflicts
 
  
- It is less important to estimate when you have projects that can be done in small stages (instead of projects that need to be done all at once).
+
* If you know that you are going to need something then just go and do it
- If the project is small it makes less sense to make estimates
+
** But senior management does not trust the estimates, so they hire consultants, which causes conflicts
- Pilot projects can help figure out long term costs
 
  
- Projects can be broken down by scope
+
* It is less important to estimate when you have projects that can be done in small stages (instead of projects that need to be done all at once).
 +
* If the project is small it makes less sense to make estimates
 +
* Pilot projects can help figure out long term costs
  
- Sometimes estimates are not honest, but designed to underbid the competition
+
* Projects can be broken down by scope
+ Who pays for the overruns?
 
+ There can be penalty clauses in these contracts
 
+ Getting the lowest contract can be a problem
 
+ If you incur penalties you get taken off the list of approved contractors, but you just change your name and try again
 
+ This can result in lawsuits
 
+ There can be completion bonds, etc
 
+ As soon as lawyers get involved costs go up dramatically
 
  
- It can be a problem when sales team promise things without telling engineering
+
* Sometimes estimates are not honest, but designed to underbid the competition
 +
** Who pays for the overruns?
 +
** There can be penalty clauses in these contracts
 +
** Getting the lowest contract can be a problem
 +
** If you incur penalties you get taken off the list of approved contractors, but you just change your name and try again
 +
** This can result in lawsuits
 +
** There can be completion bonds, etc
 +
** As soon as lawyers get involved costs go up dramatically
  
- Doing estimates can give you a ballpark about the costs
+
* It can be a problem when sales team promise things without telling engineering
+ but now you may have to have consultants vetting other consultants
 
  
- To some extent you can play vendors off against each other
+
* Doing estimates can give you a ballpark about the costs
+ Big software companies will have pre-sales engineering teams to help you figure out your costs
+
** but now you may have to have consultants vetting other consultants
+ They can also outbid you if they want
 
  
- How do you deal with projects where you have blown the time constraints?
+
* To some extent you can play vendors off against each other
+ You can hire subcontractors
+
** Big software companies will have pre-sales engineering teams to help you figure out your costs
+ Drop parts of the project
+
** They can also outbid you if they want
  
- RFPs can tell you what they have to offer
+
* How do you deal with projects where you have blown the time constraints?
+ They can help you anticipate some of the pitfalls
+
** You can hire subcontractors
 +
** Drop parts of the project
  
- Do requirements documents of what you need
+
* RFPs can tell you what they have to offer
+ Talk with the vendors/engineers from the companies
+
** They can help you anticipate some of the pitfalls
+ But the vendors will not tell you the horror stories
 
  
- People's behaviours can change once the ystem changes
+
* Do requirements documents of what you need
+ eg people beginning to use email as file storage
+
** Talk with the vendors/engineers from the companies
 +
** But the vendors will not tell you the horror stories
  
- Breaking down projects into chunks
+
* People's behaviours can change once the ystem changes
+ This shows you things that you are missing
+
** eg people beginning to use email as file storage
+ Then you can better understand what the project is
 
+ Start aspects of the project that you can learn from and what different tasks are involved
 
+ But you cannot do this with monolithic systems
 
  
- Fixing technical debt is more work than starting fresh
+
* Breaking down projects into chunks
 +
** This shows you things that you are missing
 +
** Then you can better understand what the project is
 +
** Start aspects of the project that you can learn from and what different tasks are involved
 +
** But you cannot do this with monolithic systems
  
- Don't be tempted to give the estimate right away
+
* Fixing technical debt is more work than starting fresh
+ Be prepared to charge extra when the estimates increase
 
  
- Sometimes competitive bids boil down to who you know?
+
* Don't be tempted to give the estimate right away
+ This is not necessarily bad because of trust
+
** Be prepared to charge extra when the estimates increase
+ But the well-known vendors have more experience winning these bids
 
+ If you start out at a big vendor and branch out on your own you can receive trust
 
  
- Talk to other people who have done the same thing
+
* Sometimes competitive bids boil down to who you know?
 +
** This is not necessarily bad because of trust
 +
** But the well-known vendors have more experience winning these bids
 +
** If you start out at a big vendor and branch out on your own you can receive trust
 +
 
 +
* Talk to other people who have done the same thing

Revision as of 02:51, 14 February 2017

Monday, 16 January 2017
Event Announcement: https://www.meetup.com/NetSquared-Kitchener-Waterloo/events/234260371/
Meeting Notes: https://www.meetup.com/NetSquared-Kitchener-Waterloo/messages/boards/thread/50529155

Estimating Time and Resources

In IT we are often asked to estimate the time and resources assorted tasks will take. Often these time/cost estimates are tied to funding, grants, and resource allocations. Unfortunately, many of us struggle at coming up with estimates more accurate than "it will take longer than expected". What are some strategies and best practices we can use to come up with better estimates? Under what circumstances does estimating things become easier? Harder? Under what conditions should we spend a lot of effort making estimates, and under what circumstances should we not?

When have you had good experiences making estimates? When have you struggled?

Announcements

  • Laptop Rescue Mission this Saturday, 21 February 2017, 4-8pm
  • Does somebody want to take over the group?

Taking Over the Group

  • Is there a venue available?
  • QSC is noisy
  • Other TWC spaces need staffing
  • Meeting at Steve's house?
  • Will anybody take the mailing lists?
  • New organizers: Bob Jonkman, Marc Paré.
  • Should we be on meetup?
    • mailman does some of this
    • NetSquared does not help with promotion
    • meetup has a large user base
    • there is a blog and a wiki already
    • there is a twitter account
  • They want the group to be face to face
  • Bob likes the peer to peer conversation
  • March meeting's at Steve's house
  • Marc will look for other venues
  • Communitech has space available to tech groups: Marc
  • Moving the mailing lists: Steve
  • Marc can host on his server and get a domain name
  • Future topic: Project management software


Estimating Resources

Discussion Points

  • What are strategies and best practices to get better estimates?
  • Under what circumstances does estimation become easier?
  • Under what circumstances does estimation become harder?
  • When should we spend a lot of effort making estimates?

Discussion

  • Horror story: server installation
    • building a server room that needed dedicated cooling
    • he estimated power consumption of each device
    • UPSes only need to be sized for the running current (they are built to handle startup current already)
    • He ended up overestimating by three times
    • The air conditioner would freeze the pipes and everything would shut down
    • He looked up currents instead of measuring them
    • How do you deal with the exhaust heat?
    • The UPSes had meters for measuring electricity draw
    • But then they dismantled the server room for other reasons
  • When is it easy?
    • Figuring out spending is easy?
      • In the horror story they sized based on existing equipment
      • Looking up specs can be difficult
    • Never?
    • When you have done this project before?
      • There are differences between software and hardware
      • But sometimes you make software similar to the stuff you made before
    • When you can look at projects similar organizations have done?
      • How do you get that information?
  • Mythical man month comes into play
    • You cannot predict how managers will manage the project
  • Example: replacing a network was the single largest line item
  • It is harder than you think always
  • There is always effort associated with making estimates
    • When is it worth the effort?
    • When projects are expensive
    • When projects are tied to specific grants
  • Waterfall vs agile software methodologies
    • Don't estimate everything at the beginning
    • Can you make estimates a little at a time?
    • But budgets are always waterfall, not agile
  • But we tend to overengineer things
    • But then your results are rejected
  • Projects always have unanticipated things
  • It is expedient to underestimate costs to win contracts and political support
    • What will future maintenence costs be?
    • If you lowball costs then you get approved
    • Who pays for the overage
    • But operational budgets are overestimated so that you get a surplus later
    • End of year rollovers are political
    • Surpluses are seen as weaknesses, not frugality
    • This applies to nonprofits as well
    • Bureaucrats look good when they give large amounts of money
    • There are not good incentives to share funds across departments/projects
  • Does that mean IT is always having to convince management for funds?
    • IT is always a cost sink
    • But technologies can reduce labour costs and stop people waste time
    • Workers should enjoy the additional gains from productivity gains
  • How do you position yourself so that you get buy-in?
    • Get the people who are affected to talk to management too
  • Sometimes estimates are done to argue for funds and sometimes they are used to find projects that should not go ahead
  • If you know that you are going to need something then just go and do it
    • But senior management does not trust the estimates, so they hire consultants, which causes conflicts
  • It is less important to estimate when you have projects that can be done in small stages (instead of projects that need to be done all at once).
  • If the project is small it makes less sense to make estimates
  • Pilot projects can help figure out long term costs
  • Projects can be broken down by scope
  • Sometimes estimates are not honest, but designed to underbid the competition
    • Who pays for the overruns?
    • There can be penalty clauses in these contracts
    • Getting the lowest contract can be a problem
    • If you incur penalties you get taken off the list of approved contractors, but you just change your name and try again
    • This can result in lawsuits
    • There can be completion bonds, etc
    • As soon as lawyers get involved costs go up dramatically
  • It can be a problem when sales team promise things without telling engineering
  • Doing estimates can give you a ballpark about the costs
    • but now you may have to have consultants vetting other consultants
  • To some extent you can play vendors off against each other
    • Big software companies will have pre-sales engineering teams to help you figure out your costs
    • They can also outbid you if they want
  • How do you deal with projects where you have blown the time constraints?
    • You can hire subcontractors
    • Drop parts of the project
  • RFPs can tell you what they have to offer
    • They can help you anticipate some of the pitfalls
  • Do requirements documents of what you need
    • Talk with the vendors/engineers from the companies
    • But the vendors will not tell you the horror stories
  • People's behaviours can change once the ystem changes
    • eg people beginning to use email as file storage
  • Breaking down projects into chunks
    • This shows you things that you are missing
    • Then you can better understand what the project is
    • Start aspects of the project that you can learn from and what different tasks are involved
    • But you cannot do this with monolithic systems
  • Fixing technical debt is more work than starting fresh
  • Don't be tempted to give the estimate right away
    • Be prepared to charge extra when the estimates increase
  • Sometimes competitive bids boil down to who you know?
    • This is not necessarily bad because of trust
    • But the well-known vendors have more experience winning these bids
    • If you start out at a big vendor and branch out on your own you can receive trust
  • Talk to other people who have done the same thing